Echoing the Imperative
A Response to David P. Goldman
A Response to David P. Goldman
A Response to Michael Lind
A Response to Michael Lind
A Response to Ganesh Sitaraman
A Response to Ganesh Sitaraman
A Response to Willy Shih
A Response to Willy Shih and Terrence Keeley
Washington Post columnist George Will has added his voice to that of Brad Thompson in decrying the rise of an un-American conservative authoritarianism, represented, among others, by such thinkers as Adrian Vermeule, Sohrab Ahmari, and yours truly.
Grant Ketteringâs critique of Coin-Flip Capitalism defends private finance as âa major competitive advantage and source of comprehensive national power.â
Imagine a schoolteacher in a mid-sized American city. She earns approximately $60,000 per year and each month contributes somewhere between 6 and 12 percent of her wages to the stateâs public employee pension plan. Given her salary and associated living expenses, a robust personal savings plan seems out of the question. For the teacher â and the firefighter, the police officer, and many other public employees â pension benefits are the only hope for financial security in retirement.
The international trading system must recover the core principles of reciprocity, security, and democracy.
A national development bank could attract the private capital that America’s infrastructure needs.
The American medical industry offers a case study of how market concentration undermines economic resilience.
Professor Dan Drezner is again illustrating how we ended up with a misbegotten consensus on globalization built upon inadequate assumptions and shallow analysis. A couple of weeks ago, we encountered him badly mischaracterizing a study about the supposed value of trade liberalization. Breezing past that issue, he is back now with a more outlandish claim, that: âa world in which âtrade were balanced, domestic industry robust, and productivity risingâ is a world that not only does not exist, but very likely cannot existâ (emphasis in original).
In physics, to reveal deeper truths, you slam particles together to expose their inner structure. The pandemic has been like that, slamming different parts of the country together, revealing it to be deeply divided by geography, race, education, and wealth. It is hard to imagine it once fit together or will ever fit together again.
A new task for government demands a new structure for its agencies.
Outdated environmental regulation poses an irrational barrier to reshoring efforts.
Reshoring strategies can only go so far without investment in Americaâs skilled workforce.
Local content requirements offer a simple intervention with benefits that its prohibitionist detractors ignore.
Faced over the past few years with a deepening sense of dread around the increasing irrelevance of academic political theory, I shifted much of my perspective on the accelerating unraveling of the modern order to media theory–specifically, media theory rooted in the work of Marshall McLuhan and his son Eric. While political theory as an endeavor is far from dead, the profound disconnect between the conceptual frameworks dominating the discipline and the reshaping of our inner and outer realities by digital technology has made it difficult to push the political debate around “tech” today in the direction the McLuhans draw us.
Join our mailing list to receive our latest research, news, and commentary.